Online News Service: Racism in Journalism

icon_digg6 Several days ago, a story published by Politico was posted entitled: “Blacks, whites hear Obama differently”, which I deem out of place for a News Service.  I subscribe to Politico for factual news that’s happening in our local, state and federal government and not about an opinion that could cause another point of contention in our already troubling political environment taking place in Washington.

Edward R. Murrow expounded on the dangers of television on society, so why should it be any different for journalists on the Internet?  Should an individual care to voice their opinion or thoughts on racism, there are numerous website to subscribe to.

Here is the article I’m referring to:

No Place forRacism

No Place forRacism

Blacks, whites hear Obama differently

On his pre-inaugural visit to Ben’s Chili Bowl, a landmark for Washington’s African-American community, President Barack Obama was asked by a cashier if he wanted his change back.

“Nah, we straight,” Obama replied.

The phrase was so subtle some listeners missed it. The reporter on pool duty quoted Obama as saying, “No, we’re straight.”

But many other listeners did not miss it. A video of the exchange became an Internet hit, and there was a clear moment of recognition among many blacks, who got a kick out of their Harvard-educated president sounding, as one commenter wrote on a hip-hop site, “mad cool.”

On matters of racial identity, many observers in the African-American community say he benefits from what’s known as “dog-whistle politics.” His language, mannerisms and symbols resonate deeply with his black supporters, even as the references largely sail over the heads of white audiences.

This is part of the reason that as a candidate, Obama won intense support among African-Americans while never being branded, in the fashion of a Jesse Jackson, as a candidate defined by race.

In January remarks about the economy, Obama made a reference to “American dreams that are being deferred,” a phrase black audiences understood without a citation as black poet Langston Hughes’. First lady Michelle Obama often cites her upbringing in the “South Side of Chicago.” On Election Night, the winner promised that “we as a people will get there,” an echo of Martin Luther King Jr. made more powerful by not expressly invoking King’s name.

Or a year ago in South Carolina, when he tried to swat down the persistent rumors that he is Muslim. “They try to bamboozle you, hoodwink you,” Obama said that night, in what many listeners heard as an unmistakable reference to activist Malcolm X, as portrayed in Spike Lee’s movie.

“All of us knew that he was referencing Malcolm X, and when he said it, the reaction was instantaneous,” said William Jelani Cobb, a professor at Spelman College who specializes in black history and politics.

Dog-whistle politics was hardly invented by Obama. One of its most deft practitioners lately was President George W. Bush. He regularly borrowed the language of evangelical Christianity and the anti-abortion movement to signal he was simpatico with their beliefs, even as he often avoided obvious displays of support that might turn off middle-of-the-road voters.

“The code words matter, how you dress matters, how you speak matters; it’s all subliminal messaging, and all politicians use it,” said Michael Fauntroy, an assistant professor of public policy at George Mason University, who specializes in  race and American politics. “Ronald Reagan used to talk about making America the shining city on a hill, which is about America as divinely inspired, and it has a deep vein in the evangelical conservative movement. It goes on all the time, and there are so many circumstances when only the target people get the message.”

But Fauntroy said the stakes were higher for Obama, who had to “deracialize himself.”

John McWhorter, a linguist at the conservative Manhattan Institute, said that he believes that in Obama’s case coded messaging, which can be a matter of words, sound or grammar or all of them, is partly conscious because “he knows it arouses black audiences.”

“Black English, especially the cadence, is becoming America’s youth lingua franca, especially since the mainstreaming of hip-hop. Its sound conveys warmth, authenticity and a touch of seductive danger not only to blacks but many whites, especially ones below about 50,” McWhorter said. “Obama’s tapping into that cadence helped win him the election. Imagine John Kerry or Hillary Clinton saying, ‘Yes, we can!’ It would have sounded phony — only in what I call a ‘black-cent’ can it sound prophetic and arousing.”

“The connection that Barack Obama has to the black community and the connection George Bush has to the evangelical community began long before they began running for president. It was a natural and deep connection, politics aside,” Fleischer said. “When they became candidates, it was a powerful, strong bond that created a base for both people. … But genuine speech with conviction has tremendous power, and there always is a tendency for the base to hear the deeper message and say, ‘That was sweet. He’s talking to me.’”

Bush used phrases lifted from church hymns and the Bible to signal an affinity for like-minded Christians. The phrase “culture of life,” became part of the political lexicon when Bush used it weeks before the 2000 election — it was a less political, more evangelical version of “pro-life.”

Bush also recognized that he had to tread carefully with his evangelism — keeping his most loyal voters satisfied, even if following through on policy initiatives might be difficult.

As for Obama, an aide declined to talk about whether it was a matter of strategy.

Beyond speech, blacks have picked up certain of Obama’s mannerisms, particularly his walk, that signal authenticity. Bush had his cowboy strut, and Obama has a swagger — a rhythmic lope that says cool and confident and undeniably black. It was most noticeable on his first post-election trip to the White House, some said.

“The swagger was out of control, dragging the left foot, it was like, ‘Barack, you have got to calm down,’” said Melissa Harris-Lacewell, a Princeton University professor who teaches courses in politics and black studies. “The swagger thing just got worse and worse during the campaign. … I am sure David Axelrod told him to stop swaggering. … I can’t imagine that anyone is telling him to do that.”

“In those circumstances, it is his blackness kind of squishing out of the edges. It’s not the same thing as deploying it like Bush did, but it has the same effect … solidifying his base of black folks,” she said.

Yet the question remains as to how far style or even swagger can take Obama among black people, without matching policies seen as beneficial to the black community.

“The swagger goes a long way for Barack, a long way,” Harris-Lacewell said, adding that the black support will mean a boost in polls. “Black people were strong supporters of Clinton because of race. … If it works for someone who is just symbolically for the black president, it will be very powerful for the actual black president.”

Notably, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele has used phrases recently like “bling bling” to describe the stimulus package and “off the hook” to describe the new RNC outreach plans, at a time when he is trying to step up the party’s appeal to African-American voters.

Beyond stylistic gestures, Obama has made several overtures to the black press since winning in November. His first print interview as president-elect was given to Ebony and his first print interview as president was given to Black Enterprise. And at his first press conference, journalists from the black press were given prime seating — yet weren’t called on for questions.

Strategy or not, Obama’s efforts will likely continue, some said, and so far have helped.

“I think that the combination of his style and his swagger and his connection to the various currents of culture make him seem like a man who is much younger than he is,” Cobb said. “But the genius with Obama is that he is fluent in it, so it doesn’t come off as a deliberate kind of doling out of references or points. It winds up to being to his benefit politically.”

I believe this short YouTube video illustrates my point exactly when it comes to today’s bad standards of journalism:

Sean Delonas’ Racist New York Post Cartoon links Barack Obama to Dead Chimp

All voices is an open and highly relevant social media site “unedited by humans”, where anyone can report and add their voice from anywhere.

Update 04 May 09:

Richard M. Benjamin: Pssssst. Has Someone Told The Times About Latinos?
from The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com by Richard M. Benjamin

“I go to a gym where there are a number of black people,” Mr. Schmidt, a white man, chirps. “We don’t often communicate. They tend to have their own circle of friends. But now, there’s been more communication. Now you have an opener. After the election, I started saying hello. I said, ‘Hey, what do you think of Obama, about our new president?’

“Now I’m getting more of a, ‘Hey, how you doing?’ than I was a year ago,” chimes Mr. Chaison, a black man.


3 Responses to “Online News Service: Racism in Journalism”

  1. March 26, 2009 at 2:36 AM

    I think you’re looking at this from the wrong direction. Obama is no more connected to black Americans whose families descended from slaves than he is to the royal family of Scotland.

    What you SHOULD be investigating is how his policies could be attached to McCain’s name pre-election and be scorned, while McCain’s were attached to his and were lauded– by inner city blacks in New York.

    Obama was elected on skin color. He has no experience in government– his cabinet picks alone are prime examples of that: four tax cheats, one of which is so incompetent that every time he opens his mouth the Dow Jones drops eight points– not a good thing in the Treasury Secretary.

    Obama won 97% of the black vote. 97%. No candidate gets that kind of support without a platform unless the primary motivation is something other than policies and ideas. Something, in fact, like color of skin.

    What you SHOULD be investigating is how on God’s Green Earth Obama could win this election without ANY serious vetting by the media. The American Journalists spent more time crowing over Sarah Palin’s daughter getting pregnant at seventeen than they spent even LOOKING at Obama’s ties to more than THIRTY known anti-American radicals, including terrorists and terrorist fund raisers.

    The answer is frighteningly simple: no one wanted to consider that the first black president might be a radical incompetent socialist, so they absolutely ignored his voting record (I mean the times when he WASN’T voting “present”), ignored his past associations, and rammed him into a seat he has no business holding.

    I could care less about his swagger or articulation. I’d like him to embrace a foreign policy that doesn’t offend our allies (Gifting Gordon Brown with NTSC format DVDS was a masterstroke of political ineptitude) or embolden our enemies (Nice Youtube video hugging Iran. Was there any way you could have make America look WEAKER to the people that want to kill us?)

    I could care less if “we cool.” How about you uncover how this clueless useful idiot got into power so we can make sure it doesn’t ever happen again?


  2. February 9, 2010 at 3:23 AM

    Why is it significant whether Obama or McCain get in? Both are controlled by the same people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Month in Review

March 2009
« Feb   Apr »

%d bloggers like this: